Initiative, Referendum, and Recall … Do we need it?

My friends and relatives on the West Coast used to send me e-mailed petitions.  None is  valid here in Texas.  In fact, Texas is only one of nine states that does not have recall as part of the Constitution.  Texas does not have initiative either.

Texas is one of a few states that does not have recall

Why?  Texans have a long distrust of their elected officials.  That feeling came out of the Reconstruction era.  When Texans finally re-gained control of their state in 1870, they wrote the present Constitution.  It is one of the wordiest documents in all the 50 states.  practically noting can be done by the Legislature without a state-wide referendum.

Recall was not considered; but if it was known, this blogger is sure it would have been included.  Of course, elected officials can be kicked out of office for misconduct.  That is left up to impeachment.   State officials have been impeached, too.  This blogger recalls a Supreme Court Justice Donald Burt Yarbrough, who was indicted for malfeasance and run out of office in the 70′s before he was impeached.   The Legislature impeached Gov. James E. Ferguson  in 1916.  No other governor has been impeached.

Initiative is what generates that annoying e-mails from the West Coast.  Out there, they can get up a petition and make almost anything into a law.  In fact, California’s state constitution has so many initiative-inspired changes that only about 40 percent of their budget can be changed with out a Constitutional amendment.   That avenue was attempted a few years ago, but California voters turned it down.

Texas Republican Gov. William P. Clements proposed Initiative and recall when he was governor.  The Democrat legislature rejected it.

 Recall can get bad officials out of office.  However, as we see in Wisconsin it was used to stop officials from making needed reforms.   The United States and the 50 states run as republics.   That means we the people choose our officials, and the elected officials conduct government.  If they are honest, then they should get an opportunity to do for their terms.

Initiative and recall moves the state towards a democracy and the whims of the populace.  That was what the founding fathers feared the most.

After Wisconsin Recall Defeat, Democrats Assess Their Operation – NYTimes.com

By the InkDemon

It was a massive win for the Republicans in Wisconsin.  The New York Times and the liberal media this morning are trying to understand what happen  Read this from the New York Times:

 

By MICHAEL D. SHEAR
Published: June 6, 2012

 Gov. Scott Walker’s victory Tuesday night in a recall election in Wisconsin raises tough questions for President Obama and Democrats nationally as they scramble to assess what it means for the enthusiasm of their voters, the power of their ground game, and their ability to compete against the huge sums of money Republicans have been raising.

Even though Mr. Obama kept his distance from the state in the final weeks of the union-led recall effort, the president’s party, his campaign team and his labor allies exerted an enormous joint effort in the state that proved ineffective against an organized and well-funded Republican apparatus.

More than 40 offices run by the Democratic National Committee and Mr. Obama’s campaign deployed more than 100 paid staff members alongside union and state volunteers for months in what amounts to the first real test of the president’s ground game before November’s election.

via After Wisconsin Recall Defeat, Democrats Assess Their Operation – NYTimes.com.

Number of the Week: Half of U.S. Lives in Household Getting Benefits – Real Time Economics – WSJ

By Phil Izzo

49.1%: Percent of the population that lives in a household where at least one member received some type of government benefit in the first quarter of 2011.

Half of U.S. households on federal benefits

Gimme the Bennies

Cutting government spending is no easy task, and it’s made more complicated by recent Census Bureau data showing that nearly half of the people in the U.S. live in a household that receives at least one government benefit, and many likely received more than one.

The 49.1% of the population in a household that gets benefits is up from 30% in the early 1980s and 44.4% as recently as the third quarter of 2008.

The increase in recent years is likely due in large part to the lingering effects of the recession. As of early 2011, 15% of people lived in a household that received food stamps, 26% had someone enrolled in Medicaid and 2% had a member receiving unemployment benefits. Families doubling up to save money or pool expenses also is likely leading to more multigenerational households. But even without the effects of the recession, there would be a larger reliance on government.

via Number of the Week: Half of U.S. Lives in Household Getting Benefits – Real Time Economics – WSJ.

My Way News – Poll: Millionaire tax popular, spending cuts too

Poll: Millionaire tax popular, spending cuts too

Email this Story

Feb 24, 4:10 AM (ET)

By ALAN FRAM

WASHINGTON (AP) – Most people like President Barack Obama’s proposal to make millionaires pay a significant share of their incomes in taxes. Yet they’d still rather cut spending than boost taxes to balance the federal budget, an Associated Press-GfK poll shows, giving Republicans an edge over Democrats in their core ideological dispute over the nation’s fiscal ills.

Scrooge McDuck?

Cartoon Millionaire Scrooge McDuck

The survey suggests that while Obama’s election-year tax plan targeting people making at least $1 million a year has won broad support, it has done little to shift people’s basic views in the long-running partisan war over how best to tame budget deficits that lately have exceeded $1 trillion annually.

“Everybody should be called to sacrifice. They should be in the pot with the rest of us,” Mike Whittles, 62, a Republican and retired police officer from Point Pleasant, N.J., said of his support for Obama’s tax proposal for the wealthy. But Whittles said he still prefers cutting government spending over raising taxes because of federal waste and what he calls “too many rules, too many regulations.”

via My Way News – Poll: Millionaire tax popular, spending cuts too.

How 40% can become a majority

By The InkDemon©

Pollsters say that the country is almost evenly divided between liberals and conservatives.  That is about 40 percent liberal and 46 percent conservative. The Democrats have proven time and time again that their 40% can easily become a majority. Then there are the independents.

So how, you say, can 40 percent become a majority?

It’s easy.  Start by looking at what the Democrats and the President are doing right now.  While you are at it, compare that to what the Republicans are doing.

Obama Logo

Obama's Logo

President Barack Hussein Obama must shore up his base.  He brought the troops home from Iraq to shore up the peace at all cost contingent in his party.  He is promising that all the troops will be out of Afghanistan by the middle of 2013. He is threatening Israel to keep the lid on the powder keg in the Middle East.

He started to release the terrorists in detention at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba..  That was to shore up the civil libertarians.   He passed healthcare as he promised in 2008. He “saved the environment’ by banning oil drilling in Anwar and pipeline construction across the nation’s midsection.

He has shown himself to be the friend of the big union bosses to shore up his union base.

Once his base is shored up, he can work on the independents (the Indies) and the right.  That’s right … the right!

If the Republican nominee moves toward the center, he stands to lose his far-right support.  If the Republican courts the Indies, he may lose even more support from the right.  No Republican candidate has a majority.  Therefore they are resorting to Alinsky tactics to gain momentum.  In the end, this may further erode the conservative base.

Obama and the media in the meantime can play up the fact that the conservatives are fracturing.  They  will point out also that the right is stalling his stimulus bills in Congress.   He will omit the fact that most of the bills originating in the House of Representatives were killed in the Democrat-controlled Senate.

When the Indies hear rancor and  vigorous debate they complain, “Why can’t they all just get along?”   They are right, but that is short-sighted.  The Democrats will make sure that the rancor and clamoring will continue.  They won’t be blamed.  The media will give cover.

If the rancor on the conservative side gets further out of hand, someone may step in to open up a third party.  This will effectively splinter the conservatives.  Whether it will be Ron Paul-ites, GOOOH geeks, or someone sponsored by a far-left wing billionaire, it won’t matter.  The third-party ”hero” will get more than plenty of press coverage.  He won’t have to answer tough questions. The answers will sound “perfectly logical” to the Indies and the disaffected right.

Obama recently used the National Prayer Breakfast to make a case to the Christian Evangelicals.  The Republicans need them to win.  The left will remind these Evangelicals  that helping the poor is exactly What Jesus Would Do.  They will recite the Beatitudes, the Ten Commandants, and any other verse or passage to remind devout Evangelicals that it is indeed What Jesus Would Do.  That’s exactly what Obama did during the National Prayer Breakfast.  It will work, too.  It has in the past.

The Indies may stay in the Obama Camp in November.  Some of the Evangelicals will say that Jesus whispered in their ears to vote for Obama or they will stay at home.  Some people have an almost insane idea that if they don’t vote, they are not responsible for what happens in the political process.  They are wrong.

The disaffected and angry conservatives will bite their lower lips, fold their arms and stay at home, effectively voting for Obama.  The remainder of the right will show their “pride” and vote for the third-party candidate. They will believe that their vote did not elect Obama.

Have you ever heard a Ross Perot voter boast that he was not responsible for the debacle created by the Clinton Regime?

That is exactly how 40 percent become a majority on election day.

Republicans must ignore the rancor, decide on a candidate, and be ready to support the eventual nominee.  We need every voter.  Have you hugged a Ron Paul-ite today?  If not, do it!

The Stimulus Chart Obama Doesn’t Want You to See | RedState

Posted by Congressman Jim Jordan (Diary) on Red State Pundit

Friday, February 17th at 3:30PM EST

Three years ago today, President Obama signed his infamous stimulus package into law. In exchange for $1.2 trillion (including interest), liberals said their plan would bring the unemployment rate down to about 6% today. It hasn’t fallen below 8% at any point in the last 36 months.

There has been a recent drop, though, which some Democrats claim as proof that their stimulus plan finally worked. But if that’s true, then where are the jobs?

Where Are the Jobs?

As more and more people have learned recently, the official unemployment rate doesn’t actually count unemployed people who have given up looking for work. The above chart offers another look at the jobs data. It shows the “labor force participation rate,” which represents the share of working-age Americans who are either employed or unemployed but looking for work.

As you can see, only 63.7% of working-age Americans are currently in the workforce. The rate hasn’t been that low in almost 29 years! To put it another way, 36.3% of working-age Americans do not have a job and are not even looking.

via The Stimulus Chart Obama Doesn’t Want You to See | RedState.

Obama wins round in Congress – AP

 

WASHINGTON AP — Congressional negotiators ended a bruising election-year fight and sealed an agreement late Wednesday on legislation to renew a payroll tax cut for 160 million workers and jobless benefits for millions more, a top priority of President Barack Obama.

The $150 billion measure represents a tactical retreat for Republicans, who were generally unenthusiastic about the legislation but eager to move beyond the issue.

With Obama up for re-election in November, they did not want the president and Democrats in Congress to be able to claim that Republicans were blocking a tax cut for middle-class workers.Democratic Sen. Max Baucus and Rep. Dave Camp announced the agreement, a rare burst of bipartisanship in a bitterly divided Congress that paves the way for votes in both House of Representatives and Senate this week.

via Congress deal reached on payroll tax measure – Yahoo! News.

CBO report forecasts unemployment rate at 10% in 2012 – The Daily Economist

CBO report forecasts unemployment rate at 10% in 2012

Written By Kenneth Schortgen Jr
on Tuesday, January 31, 2012 | 10:26AM

In what assuredly would be a devastating economic indicator for President Obama, the Congressional Budget Office CBO came out with a report forecasting the unemployment rate for 2012.

Obama's economic measures failing America's unemployed

Obama's economic measures failing America's unemployed

While manipulated BLS reports in November and December dropped the rate down to 8.5%, the truth is those numbers reflect less people receiving unemployment benefits and don’t take into account the hundreds of thousands who fell off the roles.

And the fact that the CBO predicted negative $2.5 trillion in net debt by 2011 back in 2011 is largely ignored.

Anyway, here are some of the highlights. 2012 Deficit: $1.1 trillion; 2013 Deficit: $0.6 – yes, we are cackling like mad too…

Unemployment to remain above 8% in 2012 and 2013; will be around 7% by end of 2015; to drop to 5.25% by end of 2022.

This forecast is utterly idiotic and is completely unattainable unless the US workforce drops to all time lows and the US economy generates 300,000 jobs a month for 10 years.

Needless to say, CBO assumes the best of all worlds in this meaningless forecast But here is the kicker:

“Had that portion of the decline in the labor force participation rate since 2007 that is attributable to neither the aging of the baby boomers nor the downturn in the business cycle on the basis of the experience in previous downturns not occurred, the unemployment rate in the fourth quarter of 2011 would have been about 1¼ percentage points higher than the actual rate of 8.7 percent” translation: CBO just admitted that the BLS numbers are bogus and real unemployment is 10%. Thank you – CBO via Zerohedge

 

via CBO report forecasts unemployment rate at 10% in 2012 – The Daily Economist.

The legacy of the first Do Nothing Congress

The liberal cable media and the left-wing main stream media are referring to the current Congress as the Do Nothing Congress.

The Tea Party conservatives have succeed in stopping the runaway spending by the Obama-Pelosi-Reed Spend-a-crats.   Yet much still must be done to bring the economy back.

But where did this term Do Nothing Congress originate?    It was first used by Democrat President Harry S Truman in describing the 80th Congress. It worked to gain his re-election, too.

Here’s what happened.

In 1946, the spending by Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s New Deal and the Second World War left the United States strapped with huge debts.  In fact, debt was 100 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) just as it is now.

Republicans swept into power and controlled both the House of Representatives and the Senate.  The GOP immediately set about reversing the laws passed during the New Deal and Truman’s Fair Deal.

Here is a list of legislation that came out of the Do Nothing Congress:

  1. Approved assistance to Greece and Turkey.  They were being threatened by communists from within and the Soviet Union from without
  2. Passed the Taft-Hartley Act that monitors the activities of organized labor and assures workers the right to not be  forced into unions.  Truman vetoed the Taft-Hartley Act, but the “Do Nothing Congress” overrode his veto.(read more…)
  3. Passed the National Security Act that created the Air Force, the CIA and re-aligned American’s intelligence network to counter Soviet espionage. (read more …)
  4. Minerals Leasing Act (read more …)
  5. U.S. Information Exchange Act which set up the Voice of America radio stations.  (read more …)
  6. Here’s the  big one … the Marshall Plan for assistance for Western Europe which was near collapse and was being threatened from within and without by the Soviet Union (read more …)
  7. Peacetime draft
  8. Greek-Turkish Assistance Act.
  9. Civil Air Patrol
  10. Presidential Succession Act that names the Speaker of the House to be vice president when there is no VP.
  11. Federal Water Pollution Control Act.
  12. War Claims Act that liquidated German and Japanese assets and paid claims to American prisoners of war and detainees.
  13. Agricultural Act of 1948. (Read more …)

Above all, the “Do Nothing Congress” proposed the Twenty-Second Amendment to the Constitution which limited the President to two consecutive terms in office.  This amend was ratified in 1951.  (read more …)

All these measures were signed into law by Harry Truman, who named the congress the Do Nothing Congress.

“The 80th Congress was nicknamed the “Do Nothing Congress” by President Harry Truman. The Congress opposed many of the bills passed during the Franklin Roosevelt administration. They also opposed most of Truman’s Fair Deal bills. Yet they passed many pro-business bills. During the 1948 election Truman campaigned as much against the “Do Nothing Congress” as against his formal opponent, Thomas Dewey,” according to Wikipedia.com. (bold face added)

The Do Nothing Congress also took over the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) investigated communist influence in Hollywood and elsewhere.   Truman denounced the HUAC, but documents seized for the Soviet secret police revealed that some of Truman’s and Rosevelt’s top advisors were indeed working for the KGB.

Truman also played the race card.  (read more …)

Now President Barack Hussein Obama has revived the strategy that worked for Truman in 1948.  Will it work in 2012?  We will see.

Pork Chop Hill and the American voting public

Pork Chip Hill movie

Pork Chip Hill told more about us than we really wanted to know, although we knew it already.

The MGM channel recently released a vintage movie, Pork Chop Hill.  It was released in 1959 and was based on an actual account of the last battle of the Korean War.  I remember where I was when I saw it in 1959.  It was at a theater in Mexia, Texas.  I don’t remember the name of my date.

I was very interested in this movie because the movie was based on a book written by historian and author Brig. Gen. S.L.A. Marshall  He was known as SLAM to his friends.  I have read every book he wrote.

I first remember Gen. Marshall in an interview he gave to CBS news in 1967 before the Israeli-Arab war.   When every political pundit had predicted dire consequences for the outnumber Israelis, Marshall assessed that the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) was a small professional army that could easily handle the Arabs who had overwhelming numbers of poorly trained and poorly motivated men and equipment.  He was right!  In six days, the IDF was on the banks of the Nile and outside the gates of Damascus.  The Arabs asked for peace.

Marshall died in 1977 and left a legacy of controversy that even brews to this day.  He was a journalist who joined the U.S. Army during the Second World War.  As a journalist his job was to document the events of WWII.  Gen. Marshall went much further, and his findings told us something about ourselves that we really did not want to know, although we knew it all along.

Marshall’s studies revealed that only 20 percent of the soldiers in action ever fired their weapons.  He went further and said that that ratio extends into private life, as well.

Pork Chop Hill movie poster

The film depction of an actual event has brewed controversy and has become the film noir of war movies

Whether it is on your job, in church, or political life only 20 percent of the people do 80 percent of the work.  In political life, it may be even lower than that!

Economists call it the Pareto Principle.  It goes like this:

  1. 80% of your profits come from 20% of your products
  2. 80% of your sales come from 20% of your sales staff!

In wealth, 20% of the people have 80% of the wealth.  That’s where the controversy is … if you look at it as a socialist or a communist or a progressive.

Some people strive to be 80 percenters.   A friend, who was an accountant, illustrates this principle.  He worked for a Central Texas utility company in Killeen.  He felt his and his wife’s interests would be best served if he could get a U.S. government Civil Service job which were were handed out like water.   The U.S. Army and Department of Defense was the biggest employer in the area.

He finally got his wish and ended up in the Fort Hood accounting office.  They gave him a pile of paper work to do.  He did it and asked his supervisor for more.

He said his supervisor looked alarmed but gave him more work.  This went on for a few days.   The supervisor told him he was working too fast.  “The principle here was to pace one’s self and always keep a backlog of work on your desk,” the supervisor advised him.

He was a 20 percenter.  That working principle was not his style.  He went back to civilian work.

As a journalist, I worked every writing beat on my last paper.  I was rewarded with a supervisory position.  I was the city editor with 10 writers and two photographers to give assignments and supervise.  I edited all their copy and advised them where they need to improve.   When I found slackers, I had them fired.   In rising in my profession,  I passed up several other people, who were employed longer than myself.  They were resentful.   They also did only the minimum amount of work to hold on to their jobs.

I eventually got a degree in computer science and moved on to another career.   I went to work for nationwide retailer in their information technology department.   My first cube mate had been there for more than four years.  We became friends and socialized. In three years, I was his supervisor.  Our friendship ended.  He saw rewards as something that should be handed out for longevity, not achievement.   I saw it the opposite way.

In local elections, such as the city council and school boards perhaps only three to 10 percent of the registered voters even vote.  That is far short of the 20/80 rule.   Even more dismal is the people who register to vote.  Some estimates are that less than 50% of those eligible to register even do so.

My personal theory is that 80 percenters will perform if rewarded, first.  For example, the Fox News Channel reported today that Wall Street protesters are being paid to protest.  Unions are in my opinion made up of 80 percenters.  Unions do give their members incentive to protest, strike, and work for political candidates.

Unions are a disincentive to work harder and innovate. For example, England once boasted the finest automobile industry in the world.   The unions through the Labor Party took over the government and the government took over the auto companies.   Today, all of the British auto manufacturers are out of business.

Back to Pork Chop Hill….

Gregory Peck played the lead character, Lt. Joe Clemons.  Capt. Joe Clemons (the same) was advisor on the movie and was named in the credits.

The movie depicts Lt. Clemons pushing his troops up the hill and exhorting them to “use your weapons!”   Some soldiers were cooking up excuses to go back to the company aid station.   One soldier was wandering around in a daze with no rifle.

The book was an allegory to American life and a study in leadership.  Clemons overcame every obstacle and captured the hill.   The lieutenant was a leader.  He accepted the challenge, and shaped his effort in to meet achieve that objective.

Obama on he other hand is someone who was a product of a entitlement society.  From all accounts his academic career was specially shaped for a minority.   He spent his time working his way up through 80 percenters.   He was elected by 80 percenters.

Now that his policies have failed, his objective is not to achieve but to blame someone.  His objective his turned to just get re-elected.

It’s was good thing that this country was conceived and built by 20 percenters.